DM: Syllogisms & Logical Deduction
What Are Syllogisms?
A syllogism is a logical argument consisting of two premises and a conclusion. In the UCAT, you are given premises and asked whether a particular conclusion necessarily follows. The key word is necessarily — the conclusion must be guaranteed by the premises, not merely possible.
Standard Syllogism Structure
Premise 1: All A are B.
Premise 2: All B are C.
Conclusion: Therefore, all A are C. → Valid
Types of Statements
- Universal Affirmative (All A are B): Every member of group A is also a member of group B
- Universal Negative (No A are B): No member of group A is a member of group B
- Particular Affirmative (Some A are B): At least one member of group A is also a member of group B
- Particular Negative (Some A are not B): At least one member of group A is not a member of group B
Common Valid Forms
- All A are B + All B are C → All A are C ✓
- All A are B + No B are C → No A are C ✓
- Some A are B + All B are C → Some A are C ✓
- All A are B + Some B are C → INVALID (we cannot conclude ‘Some A are C’ because the ‘some B that are C’ might not overlap with A)
Common Invalid Forms (Traps!)
- Affirming the consequent: All A are B + X is B → X is A (INVALID — B could include non-A members)
- Denying the antecedent: All A are B + X is not A → X is not B (INVALID — X could still be B via another route)
- Undistributed middle: All A are B + All C are B → All A are C (INVALID — A and C are both subsets of B but may not overlap)
The Venn Diagram Method
For complex syllogisms, draw Venn diagrams:
- Draw a circle for each term (A, B, C)
- Shade or mark regions based on the premises
- Check if the conclusion is necessarily true based on your diagram
- If you can draw a diagram where the premises are true but the conclusion is false, the conclusion does NOT follow
UCAT-Specific Syllogism Tips
- Pay extreme attention to the quantifiers: ‘all’, ‘some’, ‘no’, ‘none’ — these change everything
- ‘Some’ means ‘at least one’ in logic, not ‘a few’ or ‘many’
- Watch for the word ‘only’: “Only doctors can prescribe” means “If someone can prescribe, they are a doctor” — NOT “All doctors prescribe”
- If a conclusion uses a stronger quantifier than the premises support, it is invalid